Published July 16, 2015
Professional advisers provide advice to clients. In an advice relationship, decisions are always for the client to make. Clients can choose to accept advice, or ignore it.
Often a professional adviser will be asked by their client to take on a professional trustee role.
This can make good sense. A trusted adviser will often have a good understanding of the client’s business, family and financial affairs.
However, potential problems and conflicts can arise between trustee and advisory roles.
An example would be where a client fails to make the distinction between the advisory role of a professional adviser, and the decision making role required of a professional trustee.
Trustees have decision making roles. It’s not an advisory relationship.
Professional trustees come to the trustee table as an ‘equal’ with their co-trustees.
A warning sign for potential problems would be where a ‘client’ wants to remain in control as the decision maker. Another would be a professional trustee taking a ‘back seat’ approach to their stewardship role.
Trustees need to sit together in the front seat with their eyes on the road ahead.
There can also be a conflict between the requirements of advisory and decision making roles. This potential for conflict needs to be recognised, discussed and managed in a transparent way.
In some cases a ‘client’ will decide it’s more important for their professional advisor to remain solely an adviser. In other cases, they’ll be comfortable with the same person undertaking both roles.
For professional trustees wishing to reset the terms of their trustee appointment, it starts with a conversation on what’s important.
Trust good practice.
Get your Free 127 page Trustee Guide!
21 trust experts share their best strategies to help trustees plan and manage their trusts.
PLUS: We’ll keep in touch with tips & insights on good trustee practice.
© Trustee Support Ltd 2017. All rights reserved.